How governments tax, spend, and borrow to shape economies · The Union Budget, deficits, and public finance in India.
Fiscal policy is one of the most powerful tools available to governments for managing economic performance. It encompasses all decisions about taxation, public spending, and government borrowing — the levers through which the state influences aggregate demand, resource allocation, and income distribution. When a government cuts taxes to stimulate consumption, builds infrastructure to create jobs, or borrows to finance a deficit, it is practicing fiscal policy. The scale and direction of these decisions shape everything from inflation rates to employment levels, from the quality of public services to the burden of debt passed on to future generations.
In India, fiscal policy is particularly consequential because of the government's dominant role in the economy. The Union Budget, presented annually by the Finance Minister in Parliament, is not merely an accounting exercise; it is a statement of national economic priorities. It determines how much citizens pay in taxes, what public goods they receive, and how the government plans to close the gap between what it earns and what it spends. Understanding fiscal policy is therefore essential for any citizen who wishes to evaluate government performance, hold elected representatives accountable, and participate meaningfully in democratic debate.
The COVID-19 pandemic placed fiscal policy at the center of public attention as never before. Governments worldwide deployed unprecedented fiscal stimulus to prevent economic collapse, and India's response — combining direct spending, tax relief, credit guarantees, and food distribution — illustrated both the potential and the limits of fiscal intervention in a developing economy. The pandemic also raised fundamental questions about the balance between fiscal prudence and the imperative to protect lives and livelihoods, questions that continue to shape India's fiscal trajectory in the years that followed.
Fiscal policy refers to the use of government revenue collection (primarily taxes) and expenditure (spending) to influence the economy. It is distinct from monetary policy, which is conducted by the central bank and focuses on interest rates and money supply. While monetary policy works through financial markets and credit conditions, fiscal policy operates directly through the government's budget — taxing households and firms, purchasing goods and services, and transferring resources to those in need.
When the economy is in recession or growing below potential, governments may pursue expansionary fiscal policy: increasing spending, reducing taxes, or both. The goal is to boost aggregate demand — the total spending in the economy — and thereby stimulate output and employment. In the Keynesian framework, government spending can have a "multiplier effect": each rupee of government expenditure generates more than one rupee of total income as the money circulates through the economy. A government that builds a road pays construction workers, who spend their wages at local shops, whose owners then purchase more inventory, creating a chain of economic activity.
In India, expansionary fiscal policy has been used during crises like the 2008 global financial crisis, when the government launched three fiscal stimulus packages totaling over ₹1.86 lakh crore, and during the COVID-19 pandemic, when it announced the Aatmanirbhar Bharat package with a fiscal outlay of approximately ₹20 lakh crore (though much of this was in the form of credit guarantees and liquidity measures rather than direct spending). The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which provides guaranteed rural employment, functions as an automatic fiscal stabilizer: demand for work increases during economic downturns, and government spending rises without any new legislative action.
When the economy is overheating — with high inflation and unsustainable asset prices — governments may pursue contractionary fiscal policy: cutting spending, raising taxes, or reducing transfers. The goal is to cool aggregate demand and prevent inflation from spiraling out of control. Contractionary policy is politically difficult because it involves taking money away from voters or reducing popular programs. It is therefore less common than expansionary policy and is often pursued only when external pressures (such as IMF conditions or bond market discipline) leave no alternative.
India's experience with contractionary fiscal policy includes the period after the 1991 balance of payments crisis, when the government was forced to cut subsidies and reduce the fiscal deficit as part of structural adjustment. More recently, the FRBM (Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management) Act has sought to institutionalize fiscal discipline by setting targets for deficit reduction, though these targets have been relaxed multiple times during crises.
Not all fiscal policy requires active government decisions. Automatic stabilizers are features of the fiscal system that automatically dampen economic fluctuations without any change in legislation. In India, the most important automatic stabilizer is the progressive income tax system (though India's tax system is less progressive than those of many advanced economies). During a boom, tax revenues rise faster than income because higher earners move into higher tax brackets; during a recession, revenues fall automatically, leaving more money in private hands. Similarly, welfare spending like MGNREGA and food subsidies increases automatically during downturns as more people qualify for assistance.
Taxation is the primary source of government revenue and the principal mechanism through which fiscal policy redistributes income. India's tax system is complex, with multiple levels of government (Union, state, and local) each levying different taxes. The Goods and Services Tax (GST), introduced in 2017, represented the most significant tax reform in independent India, replacing a patchwork of central and state taxes with a single unified tax.
Direct taxes are levied on individuals and corporations based on their income or wealth. In India, the main direct taxes are:
Indirect taxes are levied on goods and services rather than on income or wealth. They are "indirect" because the burden is passed on to consumers through higher prices. The GST, implemented on July 1, 2017, subsumed most central and state indirect taxes into a single tax with multiple rates (0%, 5%, 12%, 18%, and 28%, plus a cess on luxury and sin goods).
India's tax-to-GDP ratio — the total tax revenue as a percentage of GDP — is among the lowest in the world at around 17-18% (including both central and state taxes). This compares unfavorably to the OECD average of approximately 34% and to emerging economies like Brazil (33%) and South Africa (29%). The low tax ratio reflects the large informal sector, widespread tax evasion, and generous exemptions. It also constrains the government's ability to fund public services, build infrastructure, and provide social protection. Raising the tax-to-GDP ratio is widely recognized as essential for India's development, but it requires difficult political choices about expanding the tax base, reducing exemptions, and improving enforcement.
Government spending is the other side of the fiscal equation. Where taxation takes resources out of private hands, expenditure puts them back into the economy — directly through purchases of goods and services, and indirectly through transfers to individuals and states. The composition of government spending reveals a country's priorities: a government that spends heavily on education and health is signaling a commitment to human development, while one that spends on subsidies and defense is making different trade-offs.
Capital expenditure (capex) is spending on assets that create future productive capacity: roads, bridges, railways, power plants, schools, hospitals, and digital infrastructure. Capex has a multiplier effect on the economy because it creates jobs during construction and enhances productivity once completed. In recent years, the Indian government has emphasized capex as a growth driver, with the Union Budget 2023-24 raising capital expenditure by 33% to ₹10 lakh crore. Major infrastructure projects include the Bharatmala road network, the Sagarmala port modernization program, the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (housing), and the Jal Jeevan Mission (rural water supply).
However, the quality of capital expenditure matters as much as the quantity. India has a long history of infrastructure projects that are delayed, over budget, or poorly maintained. The World Bank's "Doing Business" reports have consistently highlighted infrastructure gaps — particularly in power, transport, and logistics — as a major constraint on India's competitiveness. The government's focus on capex is therefore welcome, but it must be matched by institutional reforms in project planning, procurement, and execution to ensure that spending translates into actual infrastructure rather than just budget allocations.
Revenue expenditure is spending on day-to-day operations and consumption: salaries, pensions, interest payments, subsidies, and maintenance. Unlike capex, revenue expenditure does not create assets, but it is essential for the functioning of the state. The share of revenue expenditure in total spending has been declining as the government shifts resources toward capex, but it still accounts for the majority of the budget.
India's spending on education and health as a percentage of GDP is among the lowest in the world. The government spends approximately 3% of GDP on education and 1.5% on health, well below the global averages and its own targets. The National Education Policy 2020 and the National Health Policy 2017 have set ambitious goals for increasing these shares, but fiscal constraints have limited progress. Social sector spending is often the first casualty of fiscal consolidation, as capex and interest payments are considered more urgent. This has long-term consequences: poor education and health outcomes reduce human capital, limit productivity, and perpetuate inequality.
The Union Budget is the annual financial statement of the Government of India, presented by the Finance Minister in Parliament on February 1 (since 2017; previously it was presented on the last working day of February). The Budget is more than a revenue and expenditure plan; it is the government's principal policy document, setting out its economic priorities, tax proposals, and strategic direction for the coming year.
The Budget is accompanied by several documents that provide detailed information on the government's finances:
A fiscal deficit occurs when government expenditure exceeds revenue. In India, deficits are measured at multiple levels, each with different implications for the economy and public debt sustainability.
The revenue deficit is the excess of revenue expenditure over revenue receipts. It indicates that the government is borrowing to finance current consumption rather than investment. A high revenue deficit is a sign of fiscal ill-health because it does not create assets that can generate future income to repay the debt. The FRBM Act initially targeted the elimination of the revenue deficit, though this target has been relaxed in recent years. India's revenue deficit has narrowed since the 1990s but remains a concern, particularly at the state level where pension and salary obligations consume a large share of revenue.
The fiscal deficit is the difference between total expenditure and total receipts (excluding borrowing). It is the most widely watched fiscal indicator and represents the total borrowing requirement of the government. The fiscal deficit is financed by borrowing from the market (through government bonds), from small savings, from the Reserve Bank of India (in limited amounts), and from external sources. In 2023-24, the Centre's fiscal deficit was budgeted at 5.9% of GDP, with a target of 4.5% by 2025-26.
A high fiscal deficit can be problematic for several reasons: it "crowds out" private investment by absorbing savings that could have funded private sector projects; it can be inflationary if the government borrows from the RBI (monetization of the deficit); it increases the debt burden on future generations; and it can raise interest rates, making borrowing more expensive for everyone. However, deficit financing is also a legitimate tool for responding to crises, investing in infrastructure, and stabilizing the economy during downturns. The challenge is to maintain a sustainable deficit trajectory that supports growth without compromising long-term fiscal health.
The primary deficit is the fiscal deficit minus interest payments. It indicates whether the government's non-interest spending is covered by its revenue. A positive primary deficit means that the government is borrowing even to pay for current operations excluding interest. A zero or negative primary deficit means that the government is generating enough revenue to cover all non-interest spending and is borrowing only to pay interest on past debt. Reducing the primary deficit is essential for debt sustainability because it means that the government is not adding to the debt burden through current spending.
In 2015, the government introduced the concept of "effective revenue deficit," which excludes revenue expenditure that creates assets (such as grants for creation of capital assets) from the revenue deficit. This was a response to criticism that the revenue deficit definition was too broad, treating all revenue expenditure as consumption even when some of it financed asset creation. The effective revenue deficit is now the target for the FRBM Act's revenue deficit goal, though critics argue that this redefinition allows the government to claim fiscal improvement without actually changing spending patterns.
India's fiscal policy has evolved significantly since independence. In the early decades, the government pursued a strategy of centralized planning, with the budget serving as an instrument of the Five-Year Plans. Public sector investment was the dominant driver of growth, and the private sector was heavily regulated. The fiscal deficit was kept relatively low in the 1950s and 1960s but began to rise in the 1970s and 1980s as subsidies, public sector losses, and defense spending increased.
The balance of payments crisis of 1991 was a turning point for India's fiscal policy. The fiscal deficit had reached unsustainable levels, external debt was mounting, and foreign exchange reserves were barely sufficient to cover two weeks of imports. The crisis forced a fundamental reassessment of fiscal policy, leading to the New Economic Policy of 1991. The government reduced customs duties, abolished industrial licensing, and began dismantling the permit-quota raj. Fiscal consolidation was a key component of the reform package, though the deficit remained high throughout the 1990s and 2000s.
The 2000s were a period of rapid economic growth, with GDP growth averaging 8-9% annually. The government used the revenue windfall from growth to expand spending on social programs (like MGNREGA and the National Rural Health Mission) and to increase subsidies. The fiscal deficit declined during this period but was kept artificially low through "off-budget" borrowing and accounting adjustments. The 2008 global financial crisis led to a large fiscal stimulus, which prevented a recession but pushed the deficit back to unsustainable levels. By 2012, the fiscal deficit had crossed 5.7% of GDP, and the current account deficit was widening, raising fears of another balance of payments crisis.
The government that took office in 2014 emphasized fiscal consolidation, reducing the fiscal deficit from 4.5% of GDP in 2013-14 to 3.4% by 2018-19. However, this consolidation was partly achieved through reduced capital expenditure and off-budget borrowing (such as borrowing by public sector enterprises to fund infrastructure). The COVID-19 pandemic forced a dramatic reversal, with the deficit surging to 9.2% of GDP in 2020-21. The subsequent recovery has been characterized by a strategic shift toward capital expenditure, with the government arguing that building infrastructure is the best way to support long-term growth while creating jobs in the short term. The "Aatmanirbhar Bharat" (Self-Reliant India) initiative combines fiscal incentives for domestic manufacturing with trade protection, reflecting a more interventionist approach to industrial policy than in the previous decade.
The Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act, enacted in 2003 and effective from 2004, was India's first attempt to institutionalize fiscal discipline. The Act was passed in response to the persistent fiscal deficits of the 1990s and the recognition that fiscal profligacy was undermining macroeconomic stability. The FRBM Act sets targets for the central government's fiscal deficit, revenue deficit, and debt-to-GDP ratio, and requires the government to present a Medium-Term Fiscal Policy Statement and a Fiscal Policy Strategy Statement with each Budget.
The FRBM Act has had mixed success. On the positive side, it has created a framework for fiscal transparency, introduced medium-term planning into the budget process, and raised public awareness of fiscal deficits. The targets have also influenced political behavior, with governments reluctant to exceed the 3% deficit target by large margins even when they have the political space to do so.
However, the Act has been criticized for several reasons. First, the targets have been repeatedly missed, postponed, or redefined, undermining credibility. Second, the focus on deficit targets has led to creative accounting: governments have shifted spending off-budget (through public sector enterprises), reduced capital expenditure rather than current spending, and used one-time revenue (like spectrum auctions or disinvestment) to meet targets. Third, the Act does not address the composition of spending or the quality of fiscal adjustment, making it possible to meet a deficit target while cutting essential spending on education and health. Fourth, the Act applies only to the central government, leaving state governments (which collectively account for about half of total government spending) outside its framework. Many states have enacted their own FRBM laws, but enforcement varies widely.
Fiscal and monetary policy are the two principal macroeconomic tools, but they operate through different channels and are subject to different constraints. Understanding their differences and potential synergies is essential for evaluating economic policy.
In an ideal world, fiscal and monetary policy would be perfectly coordinated: fiscal policy would support growth when monetary policy is tight, and monetary policy would control inflation when fiscal policy is expansionary. In practice, coordination is difficult because the government and the RBI have different institutional incentives and mandates. The government wants low interest rates to reduce its borrowing costs and stimulate growth, while the RBI may want higher rates to control inflation. This tension was evident during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the government wanted the RBI to keep rates low and purchase large quantities of government bonds, while the RBI was concerned about inflation and financial stability.
The RBI's Monetary Policy Framework Agreement (2016) and the formal inflation targeting regime have strengthened the RBI's independence, but fiscal dominance — the tendency for the government's borrowing needs to override monetary policy considerations — remains a persistent risk. The RBI's role as the government's debt manager creates a structural conflict of interest, as the RBI may be tempted to keep rates low to support bond prices even when inflation warrants tightening. The government's fiscal position also affects monetary policy transmission: if the government borrows heavily, it can crowd out private borrowers and raise interest rates, undermining the RBI's efforts to stimulate credit.
India's fiscal policy faces a range of structural challenges that limit its effectiveness and threaten long-term sustainability. These challenges are not unique to India, but they are particularly acute in a country with a large informal sector, weak tax compliance, and enormous unmet needs for public goods and social protection.
India's tax-to-GDP ratio is among the lowest in the world, constraining the government's ability to invest in infrastructure and human development. Expanding the tax base requires formalizing the economy, improving tax administration, and reducing exemptions — all politically difficult tasks. The GST has improved indirect tax collection but has also created compliance burdens for small businesses. Direct tax reform has been slower, with the government reluctant to raise rates or broaden the base in ways that would affect politically powerful constituencies.
One of the most troubling trends in Indian fiscal policy is the growing use of off-budget borrowing. The government has increasingly relied on public sector enterprises, special purpose vehicles, and guarantees to fund infrastructure and other spending without recording the liabilities on the central budget. For example, the Food Corporation of India (FCI) borrows from the National Small Savings Fund to finance food subsidies, and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) raises debt through toll-operate-transfer (TOT) concessions. These arrangements keep the fiscal deficit lower than it would otherwise be but create contingent liabilities that could eventually fall on the government. The Comptroller and Auditor General has repeatedly warned about this "fiscal illusion," and economists have called for greater transparency in accounting for government liabilities.
India's subsidy bill is enormous, and the effectiveness of subsidies in reaching the intended beneficiaries is questionable. Leakages in the PDS, diversion of fertilizer subsidies, and misuse of LPG subsidies have been extensively documented. The government has made progress in targeting through direct benefit transfer (DBT) — transferring subsidies directly to bank accounts linked to Aadhaar — but challenges remain, including exclusion errors (eligible beneficiaries who do not receive transfers) and inclusion errors (ineligible beneficiaries who do). The political economy of subsidies is also complex: once a subsidy is introduced, it is very difficult to remove, even when it is inefficient or counterproductive.
India's federal structure creates additional fiscal challenges. The Finance Commission, constituted every five years, recommends the sharing of tax revenue between the Centre and the states and the distribution of grants among states. The 14th Finance Commission (2015) increased the states' share of central taxes from 32% to 42%, giving states more fiscal autonomy but also reducing the Centre's resources. The GST has created a new layer of fiscal interdependence, with states dependent on the GST Council for rate decisions and revenue sharing. Disputes over GST compensation, the terms of central grants, and the allocation of borrowing limits have become recurring features of Centre-state fiscal relations.
Climate change poses an emerging fiscal challenge that is not adequately captured in traditional fiscal frameworks. Extreme weather events — floods, droughts, cyclones — cause fiscal shocks that are difficult to predict and budget for. The government must spend on disaster relief, reconstruction, and climate adaptation, while also investing in the transition to renewable energy. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank have urged developing countries to incorporate climate risk into their fiscal planning, but India's fiscal institutions have been slow to adapt. The "green fiscal policy" agenda — using tax and spending tools to promote environmental sustainability — is still in its early stages in India.
The COVID-19 pandemic tested India's fiscal policy as never before. The nationwide lockdown in March 2020 brought economic activity to a standstill, and the government faced an unprecedented challenge: how to protect lives and livelihoods while preventing a fiscal collapse. The response was multifaceted, combining direct spending, tax relief, credit guarantees, and regulatory forbearance.
In May 2020, the government announced the Aatmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan (Self-Reliant India Mission) with a total package of ₹20 lakh crore, approximately 10% of GDP. However, the actual fiscal outlay was much smaller than the headline figure. The package included:
One of the most successful components of the fiscal response was the expansion of food security. The PMGKAY provided 5 kg of free wheat or rice per person per month to approximately 80 crore beneficiaries from April 2020 to December 2022. This cost the government over ₹3.5 lakh crore but prevented widespread hunger during the lockdown. The program demonstrated both the strength and the weakness of India's welfare architecture: the PDS, despite its inefficiencies, was able to deliver food to millions of families at a time when private employment had collapsed. However, the program also highlighted gaps in coverage, with many migrants and informal workers unable to access benefits because they were not registered in their home states.
The COVID-19 fiscal response has left a lasting imprint on India's public finances. The central government's fiscal deficit surged to 9.2% of GDP in 2020-21, and the debt-to-GDP ratio rose from approximately 70% to over 85%. The path to fiscal consolidation has been slow and uncertain, with the government prioritizing growth and capex over deficit reduction. The interest burden has increased, crowding out other spending. The use of off-budget borrowing and guarantees has created contingent liabilities that may materialize in the future. The pandemic has also intensified debates about the appropriate fiscal framework for India: should the government maintain strict deficit targets, or should it adopt a more flexible approach that allows for countercyclical spending?
Official Sources:
Books:
Academic and Policy Papers:
News and Analysis: