Mechanisms for seeking redress when rights are violated.
Overview
Rights without remedies are illusory. The Indian Constitution provides robust mechanisms for
citizens to seek redress when their rights are violated. These range from constitutional writs
to statutory human rights commissions and the innovative tool of Public Interest Litigation.
Writ Jurisdictions
Article 32: The Supreme Court's original jurisdiction to issue writs for
the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. Dr. Ambedkar called it the "soul of the Constitution."
Habeas Corpus: Produces the body; used to challenge unlawful detention.
Mandamus: Command issued to a public authority to perform a public duty.
Prohibition: Prevents a lower court or tribunal from exceeding jurisdiction.
Certiorari: Quashes orders of lower courts/tribunals passed without jurisdiction.
Quo Warranto: Challenges the legality of a person's claim to a public office.
Article 226: High Courts' power to issue writs not only for Fundamental Rights
but also for "any other purpose," making the remedy broader than Article 32.
Public Interest Litigation (PIL)
Beginning with S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981) and consolidated in S.P. Gupta v.
President of India (1982), the Supreme Court relaxed the rules of locus standi,
allowing any public-spirited individual or organization to approach the court on behalf of those
unable to do so themselves.
PIL has been instrumental in addressing environmental degradation, custodial violence, prison
conditions, and the rights of marginalized groups. However, it has also faced criticism for
judicial overreach and frivolous petitions.
Landmark PIL Cases
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1986 onwards): Series of judgments on
environmental protection including closure of polluting industries, protection of Taj Mahal,
and vehicular pollution in Delhi.
Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997): Laid down guidelines for
prevention of sexual harassment at workplace, later codified into the 2013 Act.
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985): Recognized the
right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.
National and State Human Rights Commissions
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC): Established under the Protection of
Human Rights Act (1993). Investigates complaints of human rights violations, reviews safeguards,
and promotes human rights literacy. However, its recommendations are not binding on the government.
Comprises a Chairperson (retired Chief Justice of India) and six members.
Can intervene in judicial proceedings involving human rights.
Visits jails and detention centers to monitor conditions.
State Human Rights Commissions (SHRCs): Function at the state level with
similar mandates under the same Act. 26 states have constituted SHRCs as of 2024.
Limitation: NHRC cannot investigate complaints against armed forces, which are
referred to the Central Government. This has been a subject of criticism, particularly in
conflict zones where AFSPA operates.
Sources
Last updated: 2026-08-06
Primary Sources:
Constitution of India, Articles 32-35 — india.gov.in